Kissinger Renews Call for New World Order

Link

Former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger recently appeared at the New York Stock Exchange on January 5, 2009. In an interview with CNBC following the ringing of the market bell, Mr. Kissinger stated that Barack Obama will be the "architect of a New World Order" and praised him for his "extraordinary appointments in the international and financial fields.” Kissinger went on to say that “His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”

Hmmmm. Let's see. Crisis as Opportunity. Haven't we heard that theme before somewhere...? Ah yes, Obama's tentative appointment as Chief of Staff,

Rahm Emmanuel. Mr. E is currently hiding under a dark cloud as the investigation of Illinois Gov. Blagoyevich proceeds for attempting to "sell" Obama's Senate seat.

Might we detect echoes of the same mindset that perhaps motivate Mr. Kissinger's references to a New World Order? And just what is the connection between that and Mr. Obama's ""extraordinary appointments in the international and financial fields.”

It seems that Mr. Kissinger appeared alongside Stephen Orlins, president of the U.S. National Committee on U.S.-China Relations, with two Red Chinese officials. After the ringing of the bell. Mr. Orlins observed that the 45 NYSE-listed Chinese companies with a combined $802 billion market capitalization were “emblematic of the economic integration of the two countries.” Wait... aren't the Chinese supposed to be Communists? What are they doing on Wall Street?! If you believed those two are adversaries, I've got some Clinton swampland to sell you in Arkansas.

Now, some people think "economic integration" is a good thing, mainly because they make money on it. But let's reconsider whether it represents an injustice, even enslavement, when one nation's upward "integration" (China) came at the expense of another nation's "downward" integration (USA). Furthermore, if theft, lawbreaking and deceit at the highest levels of government and business were employed to achieve it, I would further call that "stealing" and "treason".

Oh yes, my friends. The real scandal of the Clinton administration was not Monica Lewinsky, it was his sellout to the Red Chinese, e.g. Whitewater, Loral, Motorola, John Huang, COSCO, the Riady's, and more. All of it was deep sixed by ---- wait for it --- Kenneth Starr, a Republican. Nor did it begin with Beijing Billy Clinton.

Let's recall that it was Republican Richard Nixon who opened trade relations with China based on foreign policy masterminded by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. In the late 19-eighties-nineties, the Bush RINO's fought and won most favored trading nation status for the Chicoms, followed by the Clinton DINO's who circumvented export licensing and national security laws in order to deliberately engage in helping the Red Chinese modernize and build their military into a rival superpower.One of their generals thanked us in 1996 by threatening to nuke Los Angeles over our support for Taiwan. In fact, every administration since Nixon has pursued some degree of globalist policies that "sold out" our national sovereignty to further the business interests of internationalists, even if it meant doing business with corrupt, tyrannical and hostile regimes. The globalists have betrayed intelligence and military secrets, missile and communications technology, undercut domestic businesses by flooding our markets with cheap Chinese products (why ELSE would Hillary sit on the Board of Wal-Mart a purportedly "Buy American" company that turned into a "Made in China" outlet?!). They have sold our national assets to everyone from the Japanese and the rich petro-sheiks to Red China, while submerging American taxpayers under a gargantuan mountain of indebtedness to foreign, even hostile, creditors. The big secret that the average American doesn't know, is that both Clinton and Bush have financed the last two decades of our "prosperity" with massive indebtedness to the Communist Chinese. Beware of those who promote "bipartisanship".

Jesus taught that a debtor is a slave to the creditor. Do you think it was an accident that China held a huge investment in US T-bills during the "financial meltdown"? Theoretically, its possible that a threat to "unload" them triggered the "crisis" in the first place. Perhaps that accounts for the sheer panic exhibited by former Goldman Sachs Treasury Secretary Mr. Paulson, who rode in like a white knight to "save"... who?.... the US taxpayer? No. Red China. Goldman Sachs. "Treasury Nominee Paulsen Supports China's Rise to Power" And now everybody else is in line with their hand out for a bailout, virtually guaranteeing that the value of our dollar will descend to the equivalent of toilet paper. Just another "crisis" looming, rife with "opportunity" for whoever wields the power to replace the currency after ours crashes. As Mayer Amschel Rothschild is quoted to have said: “Give me control over a nation’s currency and I don’t care who makes the laws.” I suppose that selling our country out for money is just an "opportunity" masquerading as a "crisis", Mr. Kissinger.

So who is the "fall guy" for this collapse gonna be? HA. Don't you just wonder how a two bit marxist community organizer nobody ever heard of emerged from the Chicago slums like a projectile, ready to do his globalist massahs' bidding?? I do. And Mr. Obama is just the type of half-white house-negro to make it happen, a man with a huge ego and no accomplishments to justify it, a racist religious cultist, up to his eyeballs in debt until corrupt cronies Tony Rezko and Bill Ayers stepped in to make him look better than he ever really was. Or worse? A perfect fall guy.

Its ironic that Karl Marx himself understood that the insatiable, predatory nature of capitalism would lead inevitably to globalism. In the Communist Manifesto, Marx noted:

"The bourgeoisie, by the rapid improvement of all instruments of production, by the immensely facilitated means of communication, draws all, even the most barbarian nations, into civilisation. The cheap prices of commodities are the heavy artillery with which it batters down all…walls, with which it forces ‘the barbarians’ intensely obstinate hatred of foreigners to capitulate. It compels all nations, on pain of extinction, to adopt the bourgeois mode of production; it compels them to introduce what it calls civilization into their midst, i.e. to become bourgeois themselves. In one word, it creates a world after its own image."

Don't get me wrong. I'm no fan of Marxism. In fact, "Sillie Lizzie Hates Marxists". I am for free trade, small business, limited constitutional government, national sovereignty, sound money based on a fixed gold standard, individual liberty, self-government under GOD (Jehovah of the Bible) with respect for the crown rights of the Messiah Jesus Christ, King of Kings and Lord of Lords. But neither am I fan of unchecked globalist capitalism, either.

So, what does the capitalist world that Karl Marx envisioned, brought about by modern globalist fellow-travelers, look like? Affluent tyranny. A gilded cage, where the human spiirit and human dignity are reduced to the collective fodder fueling power and consumerism.

Note that alongside Red China's growing prosperity due to relaxed market capitalism, the communists never introduced any kind of political liberties for their people. Their society remains staunchly totalitarian without protest from American politicians, Republican or Democrat. Clinton certainly didn't care about Tienanmen Square, neither when it happened nor at the ten year anniversary when he visited Beijing. Nor is all that "new wealth" translating into a higher standard of living for average Chinese, since they only "spend" about half of it. So where did it go? HERE! Invested in American currency and T-bills to enslave US with debt! And so, the globalist circle is complete.

In our country, the reverse is true. The price of our prosperity since "integrating" with China came at the expense of Constitutional governance, social cohesion, fiscal integrity, debt and the erosion of national sovereignty. It was met with the same indifference and silence by the same people who promote globalism. YET, when social or civil unrest and corrupt rivalries from drug cartels, INTERFERES with the capitalist initiative to create those "emerging markets", e.g. Iraq, Bosnia, Somalia, Columbia then it is met with military force masquerading as a "surge" for "freedom" and "security", to "make the world SAFE for democracy"... (CODEWORD for the interests of international capitalists). Build 'em up, tear 'em down, suck 'em dry. I wonder if Saddam Hussein questioned who is conning who while he swung from the rope. Are the marxists suckers for the capitalists, or vice versa? And what will happen to us if we rise up to defend our nation? Who do we oppose first?

The Bible tells us that "the LOVE of money is the root of all evil". When the sole and highest virtues of mankind are WEALTH and POWER, worshipping at the altar of Humanism in all of its myriad forms (secular, atheist, religious, pagan, whatever), all of the belly aching about social justice and freedom don't enter into the consciences of those who collude together to acquire and keep it. Here in America, Republicans and Democrats, Wall Street and Main Street, Big Government, Big Business, Big Labor, Big Religion -- they're all in cahoots together over the love of money -- Greed -- all willing to band together in "unity" and "tolerance" for people of any nation who share a common cesspool of a worldview. And all the while hating and betraying their own citizens and the nations that spawned them. In America, a nation which was once uniquely "one nation, under God", that also means betraying the TRUE and LIVING GOD. There's your New World Order, and I hate it, especially in the spiritual dimension: "My Experience in the New Age Movement"